 |
|
|
|
Anil
K. Sinha is a former
Indian Administrative Service
(IAS) officer having worked
at the grassroots as well
as in senior policy making
and implementation levels.
He was the former Executive
Director of the National Institute
of Disaster Management; was
closely associated with the
High-Powered Committee on
Disaster Management and was
a key member of the team set
up by the Government of India
in the aftermath of the Gujarat
earthquake and the Orissa
super cyclone. |
|
|
|
Disaster
Risk Reduction:
A World Perspective
-
Anil Sinha

The whole world is affected by
natural hazards of varying intensities.
Loss of life and property due
to natural disasters like tropical
cyclones, floods, droughts, heavy
rainfall, thunderstorms, earthquakes,
volcanic eruptions etc. is immense.
Fortunately, for some of the greatest
natural disasters like tropical
cyclones, early warning services
are available today and by proper
long and short-term mitigative
measures, loss of lives and property
can be minimised. One of the important
components of short-term disaster
mitigation measure is the early
warning of the phenomena causing
disasters.
The importance of early warning
systems is recognized all over
the world. In 1989, the member
states of the United Nations (UN)
declared the period from 1990
to the year 2000 to be the International
Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction
(IDNDR). Its objective is to "reduce
the loss of life, property damage,
and social and economic disruption
caused by natural disasters, through
concerted international action,
especially in developing countries".
The fundamental importance of
early warning for realizing this
objective of disaster reduction
was recognized in 1991. The IDNDR's
Scientific and Technical Committee
declared the subject a programme
target, by which the success of
the Decade would be judged by
the year 2000. By drawing on global
scientific knowledge and practical
experience, the Decade's advisory
committee encouraged all countries
to ensure the ready access to
global, regional, national and
local warning systems as part
of their national development
plans. The critical nature of
early warning for the protection
of vital resources and for addressing
national development objectives
was highlighted by a technical
committee session devoted to the
subject at the World Conference
on Natural Disaster Reduction
held in Yokohama, Japan in May
1994. Several of the expert presentations
cited the importance of public
policy commitment for successful
early warning. The primary outcome
of the Conference, the Yokohama
Strategy for a Safer World: Guidelines
for Natural Disaster Prevention,
Preparedness and Mitigation further
emphasized the importance of applied
scientific knowledge and the public's
awareness of hazard risks as essential
components for more effective
early warning practices.
The International IDNDR Conference
on Early Warning Systems for the
reduction of natural disasters
was held at the GeoForschungsZentrum
in Potsdam, Germany from 7-11
September 1998. The meeting brought
together 370 scientists, public
officials, and representatives
of the United Nations system,
non-governmental and international
organizations and diverse professional,
commercial, and civic individuals
from 86 countries. The Potsdam
Early Warning Conference represented
the first major thematic component
of IDNDR's concluding evaluation
and provided recommendations to
ensure disaster reduction into
the 21st Century. It identified
major strengths and weaknesses
in early warning capacities around
the world. Participants repeatedly
emphasized the multidisciplinary
and multi-sectoral character of
the early warning process. Although
based on scientific and technology,
early warning must be tailored
to serve people's needs, their
environments, and their resources.
What Are Early Warning Systems?
The manifold vulnerability of
India and its scathing impact
on the society has left a lot
to be desired about the approach
of the country towards the concept
and practice of disaster management.
During the last couple of years,
disasters have increased both
in magnitude and severity, thus
heightening the need for pro-active
measures in the country which
would work towards knowledge dissemination,
capacity building and public awareness,
both at National as well as regional
level. In an effort towards disaster
reduction and a step towards disaster
mitigation, the capacity building
of vulnerable communities and
other role players at all levels
gains significant importance and
needs to be incorporated into
the development policies and programmes
initiated by the government. In
this light, the role of effective
early warning systems cannot be
neglected. Early warning systems
can be interpreted narrowly as
technological instruments for
detecting and forecasting impending
hazard events and for issuing
alerts. This interpretation, however,
does not clarify whether warning
information is used at the national
and local levels to reduce risks.
In order to fulfill a risk reduction
function, warnings of impending
hazards need to be complemented
by information on the risks actually
posed by the hazards and likely
strategies to mitigate the loss
and damage, which could arise.
This added value of warning information
needs to be communicated to vulnerable
groups in a way that facilitates
their own decisions and abilities
to take timely actions.

In order to transform hazard warning
information into effective risk
reduction at the national and
local level, early warning systems
must be made up of a number of
integrated sub-systems:
• A warning
sub-system, in which hazards are
monitored and forecasted, at the
international, national and local
levels. In these, scientific information
about impending hazards is produced
and communicated to national authorities
responsible for disaster management.
• A risk
information sub-system, which
can enable disaster management
authorities to generate risk scenarios.
These should indicate the potential
impact of an impending hazard
event on specific vulnerable groups
and sectors of the society.
• A preparedness
sub-system, in which disaster
preparedness strategies are developed
that indicate actions required
to reduce the loss and damage
expected from an impending hazard
event.
• A communication
sub-system, which allows the communication
of timely information on impending
hazard events, potential risk
scenarios and preparedness strategies
to vulnerable groups, so that
they may take appropriate mitigation
measures.
As such, an early warning system
is much more than a scientific
and technical instrument for forecasting
hazards and issuing alerts. It
should be understood as an information
system designed to facilitate
decision-making, in the context
of national disaster management
agencies, in a way that empowers
vulnerable sectors and social
groups to mitigate the potential
losses and damages from impending
hazard events. Those people who
are most immediately at risk should
judge the usefulness of an early
warning system, less on whether
warnings are issued per se, but
rather on the basis of whether
the warnings facilitate appropriate
and timely decision-making.
It has to be realized that Weather
Systems do not recognize any International
boundary and move freely from
place to place affecting several
countries/regions simultaneously
or one after the other. Therefore,
to prepare Weather Forecasts and
Warnings for different time periods
the meteorological data and information
are required not only from the
country where forecast is made
but also from other countries.
Longer the forecast projection,
greater is the data requirement,
and for the preparation of forecasts
valid for 3 to 5 days, data is
required from the entire globe.
The World Meteorological Organization
(WMO), a specialized agency of
the United Nations, co-ordinates
all the activities related to
Meteorology globally with it's
headquarters at Geneva, Switzerland.
The broader objective or mission
of an integrated national warning
service is:
“To promote effective community
response, to avoid potential disaster,
and thereby to reduce the loss
of life, property and environmental
damage, and the community disruption
to a realistic minimum.”
(WMO
Report No. TCP-31)
|